The Art of Winning: Elite Teams Bring on Specialty Coaches When It Counts
The voicemail message was unmistakable, that familiar crack of panic in the voice: "We just got shortlisted for a $50M infrastructure project. The interview’s in three days. Can you help?"
I recognized the desperation immediately. Corporate pressure bearing down. Needing to bring in a win to justify months of positioning and budget expenditures. High expectations from professional colleagues.
Sadly, I had to decline. Not because I was already booked (though I was), but because bringing in an interview coach this late in the game sometimes hurts more than it helps. Agency representatives want to see teams performing confidently under pressure, demonstrating they can handle whatever challenges arise during contract execution.
Strategic Timing: When Outside Expertise Eliminates Doubts
The optimal time to engage an interview coach is when your internal strategy is solidified, but before you begin final proposal preparation. Many times, the interview date is posted in the Request For Proposal, so the coach can be sure they’ll be available. A successful interview carries the winning message from your proposal across the goal line for the touchdown.
This timing respects your team's expertise while providing a fresh perspective. An outsider will immediately spot gaps that internal teams can't see, like communication blind spots, confusing technical jargon, or presentation dynamics that undermine your message.
Bringing in coaching too early sends the wrong message to your capture team. It's like ownership calling plays from the luxury box, suggesting doubt in the very people trusted with strategy development. Engaging someone too late can create doubts in your proposed staff, who need to excel during an interview. You don’t want to undermine team confidence precisely when championship-level performance is required.
The only exception I’ve made for coming under contract early was to assist a capture leader who was new to major pursuits. She had fresh energy and enthusiasm, and some great instincts, but she needed validation. Second-guessing also creates doubt.
Championship Teams Have a Trust Culture
If you follow professional football, you'll see how trust is a key factor in the winning formula. The owner of the Kansas City Chiefs, Clark Hunt, provides world-class facilities and resources but stays completely out of football operations. He hired a head coach and a general manager, then entrusted them to make all football decisions. The result? Back-to-back Super Bowl championships in 2023 and 2024. Hunt doesn't call plays, draft players, or make personnel decisions; he lets professionals do their jobs. Compare this to Jerry Jones in Dallas. His Cowboys were most successful in the 1990s when he stepped back and let Jimmy Johnson coach. Robert Kraft's Patriots dominated for two decades because he hired the right people and let them do their jobs.
Elite ownership provides resources and sets expectations, then trusts their coaching staff and players to execute under pressure. How does this compare to winning a major contract? We all understand Monday Morning Quarterbacking. In our world, it’s also known as the "Corporate Debrief." Sure, analyzing what went wrong helps prepare for the future, but those scenarios should have been contemplated during strategy sessions, not discovered in post-loss analysis.
Your Internal Team Is Your Coaching Staff
Each major contract presents unique requirements that demand a tailored approach. Agency representatives have been given the heavy responsibility to ensure that taxpayer funds are used wisely. They have the ability to choose which team meets the stated requirements. Make no mistake, they don’t always agree.
For major contract pursuits, your business development leader or capture manager is your head coach. They've been given the responsibility—and hopefully the budget—to bring in the win. Success requires letting them call the shots.
Your internal team has positioned itself for months before project advertisement. Teaming arrangements have been developed through client discussions to ensure an accurate understanding of the requirements. Key personnel have been vetted, and scheduling conflicts resolved. Differentiating factors have been identified.
The capture team has developed the strategy, built the relationships, and crafted the winning approach. The question becomes: how do you ensure flawless execution when everything is on the line?
The Championship Mindset
A former CEO I worked under used to say, "I want BD managers to stay awake at night worrying about what’s under stones that haven’t been uncovered." Trust me, I had many sleepless nights. But what stands out in my mind is the exhilaration from winning. That strategic awareness—that performance-driving intensity—separates winning teams from competitors.
You can't anticipate every variable during positioning. But you can develop the adaptability to handle whatever emerges during high-stakes pursuits. Discussing what-ifs helps as long as you understand the tricky balance between getting useful direction and analysis paralysis.
I’ve often been asked, “Do you have a method that we can replicate?” I’ve worked at two major engineering firms and have been through countless training sessions. Here’s what I learned: adaptability beats methodology every time.
Now, there are some awesome guidelines on what information should be gathered and steps to get key information, and I don’t mean to minimize those in the slightest. Having key contacts is crucial for obtaining strategic intelligence, including understanding evaluation criteria, decision-maker priorities, and competitive positioning. But treating that information like it's written in stone is a liability. Client priorities shift, evaluation committees change, and people change jobs.
Picture a football team that has practiced certain plays flawlessly against an opposing team. Then game day arrives with unexpected conditions. What happens when the rival team hires a new player who can blitz with alarming speed? When weather changes impact field conditions? When the script doesn't match reality?
Process-bound teams freeze. Adaptable teams thrive.
The same principle applies to major contract interviews. Your team might rehearse perfectly in your conference room against predictable questions. But what happens when:
The client shifts focus from technical capability to mentoring DBE firms and community impact initiatives?
A competitor's approach gets referenced, changing the entire dynamic?
Your planned 45-minute presentation gets cut to 20 minutes due to schedule changes?
The decision-maker asks pointed questions about cost overruns on a previous project?
Championship teams don't just practice plays—they develop the fundamentals and situational awareness to read conditions and adapt in real-time.
The Bottom Line
Elite teams understand the difference between scripted preparation and adaptive performance, between rigid strategy and flexible execution, between providing resources for success and micromanaging away trust.
Your internal team gets you to the championship game. Strategic coaching at the right moment ensures you win it.